Edmund Gross

Call: 2016

Download vCard

Ed has a busy criminal practice in the Crown, Magistrates’ and Youth Courts and has been instructed in a wide range of criminal matters. Those who instruct him have noted his meticulous preparation and he has been described as very approachable and professional in his manner. Furthermore, Ed has a growing practice in Financial Crime both for the defence and prosecution.

Ed’s practice is diverse and includes a growing Sports Law practice including instructions from the Rugby Football Union and sitting on MCC Disciplinary Panels. He is also a London Football Association Disciplinary Panel Member.

Ed has a growing Public Law practice, which includes being instructed for the Home Office in the Undercover Police Inquiry.

Ed has experience in both part 1 and part 2 Extradition matters at Westminster Magistrates Court on top of work done during his pupillage to assist senior members of Chambers with hearings in the Divisional Court and is keen to develop his practice further in this area.

He has also been instructed on behalf of members of the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association and has a lot of experience in driving matters in the Magistrates Court.

Financial Crime

Ed is on the SFO C Panel.

From 2020 until 2022 he was instructed by the SFO at a pre-charge stage to assist in the evaluation of evidence and management of the disclosure review in an ongoing SFO investigation.

R v D (2021):

Successfully resisted an abuse of process application on behalf of the prosecution in confiscation proceedings.

2018 to early 2020:

He was instructed by a firm to conduct a combined privilege and substantive review along with other assistance on the case, within the firm’s offices for one of their corporate clients, a large multinational, who were facing an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office.

R v BAJ & Others (2019):

Ed was instructed by the SFO to assist in the evaluation of evidence and management of the disclosure review in an international bribery and corruption case involving the procurement of oil contracts in post war Iraq.

R v B, (2019) Crown Court:

Ed was instructed to prosecute a benefit fraud.

R v L (2019), Magistrates Court:

Successfully represented client in a cash forfeiture hearing in obtaining the return of £20,000 that had been seized from L at the airport.

General Crime

Ed acts for both the prosecution and the defence. He has also advised the National Crime Agency regarding issues surrounding Legal Professional Privilege. Examples of his Court work include the following:

R v C (2022), Crown Court:

Instructed to prosecute a case of dangerous driving.

R v A (2022), Crown Court:

Instructed to prosecute a case which involved the possession of machete. The trial stemmed from a murder investigation.

R v J  (2022), Crown Court:

Instructed to prosecute a trial involving a defendant threatening an individual with a bladed article.

R v M (2021), Crown Court:

Instructed to defend in a section 18 trial.

R v S (2019), Crown Court:

S pleaded guilty to the importation of 4 handguns and over 100 rounds of ammunition. The maximum sentence is life imprisonment. After extensive mitigation, including a detailed analysis of the development of sentencing law in relation to the importation of firearms, SL received a sentence of 8 years and 3 months.

R v T (2019), Crown Court:

Secured acquittal for T who was charged with racially aggravated common assault.

R v S (2019), Crown Court:

S pleaded guilty to possession of an offensive weapon, namely a knuckleduster. After detailed mitigation, S was sentenced to a conditional discharge.

R v LM (2019), Crown Court:

M was a third striker for domestic burglary. Successfully mitigated to ensure that the minimum sentence was not handed down, but instead M was sentenced with a community order.

R v H (2019), Crown Court:

H was serving 10 years in prison and while serving his sentence pleaded to numerous additional burglary offences which had taken place prior to the offence for which he was in custody. Successfully persuaded the Judge to make the sentence for those additional matters concurrent rather than consecutive to the 10 year sentence.

R v M (2019), Magistrates Court:

Represented a city professional who was charged with assault. After extensive cross examination of all three of the Crown’s witnesses and detailed closing submissions, he was acquitted.

R v M (2019), Crown Court:

M was charged with one count of possession of a bladed article. After considerable work detailing the weaknesses in the Crown’s case, the matter was dropped on the day of trial.

R v L (2018), Youth Court:

SL was charged with two counts of Robbery and one count of Fraud. Successfully applied to have ID evidence excluded and, caused the Crown to offer no evidence on both robbery counts. Following a plea to the fraud charge, persuaded the court to impose a conditional discharge.

R v M (2018), Youth Court:

M faced four charges of common assault and one charge of criminal damage. Intermediary required as M had serious difficulties with communication. At his first appearance he pleaded to one common assault and one criminal damage and the Crown dropped the other common assault charge. Persuaded the Court to impose a four-month referral order.

R v E (2018), Magistrates Court

Successfully defended E who had been charged with possession of a bladed article.

R v B (2018), Crown Court

Persuaded the Judge to make the sentences for the common assault offences committed whilst B was serving an SSO concurrent to the SSO which was being activated.

Public and Administrative Law

Ed has a growing practice in this field. He is currently instructed for the Home Office in the Undercover Police Inquiry. Additionally, he is instructed to assist in a complex disclosure exercise in a judicial review claim arising from alleged extrajudicial killings by UK forces in Afghanistan.

Previously he has been instructed by the Department of Health and Social Care on work in relation to European Union exit legislation.

During his masters, Ed obtained a Distinction in his dissertation- ‘The Special Immigration Appeals Commission: an unfortunate but justifiable necessity?’

Sport

Ed was instructed as part of a barrister and solicitor team by a national sport’s governing body who are exploring the implementation of a new governance structure.

Ed has been instructed in a wide range of regulatory and disciplinary matters by the Rugby Football Union which includes issues relating to anti-doping.

Ed has been sitting on MCC Disciplinary Panels for a number of years. He is also a London Football Association Disciplinary Panel Member.

Before commencing pupillage, Ed spent a year with leading disputes practice Peters & Peters LLP. He worked in their Commercial Litigation team on a high-profile case that had been brought by over 100 individuals, including many high profile footballers and cricketers, in relation to investments in schemes offered by The Ingenious Group.

Ed enjoys writing on all issues relating to Sports Law. Previous publications include:

  • Article published in the Football Legal, the international journal dedicated to football law, analysing the High Court’s decision in Mercato Sports (UK) Ltd & McKay v Everton FC. (2019)
  • Article published by LawInSport, the leading sports law website in the world, “Knocked Down, but Not Out – A Review of the ICC’s new Concussion Replacement Regulations”. (2019). Ed co-authored the article with Thomas Cleeve, of Penningtons Manches Cooper solicitors. The article explored the new concussion replacement substitutions in cricket.
  • Article published by LawInSport, “The curious case of Wigan Athletic and the English Football League’s owners & directors test”. (2020). Ed co-authored this article with Wayne Barnes, Partner at Fulcrum and head of their Sports Law team.
  • Article published by LawInSport, “Practical Considerations For Introducing A ‘Fit and Proper Test’ To Elected Members OF World Rugby’s Council”. (2021). Ed co-authored this article with the Fulcrum Sports Law team.
  • Article published by LawInSport, “Here we go again – how to address pitch invasions in English Football?” (2022).
  • Article published by LawInSport, “How have the pitch invasions at Everton and Manchester City been dealt with by the FA?”. (2022). This was a follow up piece to Ed’s article earlier in 2022 on pitch invasions in football.
Driving

R v H (2019), Magistrates Court:

Successfully represented H who was accused of driving a vehicle whilst using a handheld mobile telephone. After lengthy cross examination of the Crown’s witness and detailed closing submissions H was acquitted.

R v H (2019), Magistrates Court:

Successfully argued exceptional hardship and therefore H retained his licence.

R v A (2019), Magistrates Court:

A was accused of driving a vehicle whilst using a handheld mobile telephone. After detailed cross examination of the crown’s witness A was acquitted.

R v W (2018), Magistrates Court:

W had driven into the back of a black cab and this was witnessed by a civilian witness. He was charged with driving without due care and attention. After extensive cross-examination of the civilian witness and two police officers W was acquitted.

R v H (2018), Magistrates Court:

H was charged with failing to provide a specimen. Managed to persuade the court to fine and disqualify him for fourteen days, rather than giving him points which would have led to an automatic revocation of his licence.

R v S (2018), Magistrates Court:

Successfully argued exceptional hardship and therefore S retained his licence.

Other Experience

During his BPTC year Ed was a mentor for Vocalise and taught debating at HMP Feltham.

Education

Law LLB, Oxford Brookes University, First Class

LLM, University College London, Merit

BPTC, BPP, Very Competent

Scholarships and Prizes

Gray’s Inn, Patrick Back Scholarship

University College London Judicial Institute Placement Award

Oxford Brookes University Future Barrister Scholarship

Prize for Outstanding Contribution to the Oxford Brookes University School of Law

Appointments and Professional Memberships

SFO C Panel

CPS Level 2

Attorney General’s Junior Juniors scheme (2018 – 2022)

Young Fraud Lawyers Association

Defence Extradition Lawyers Forum

Criminal Bar Association

LawInSport Plus Member

Clerk to the Bar Tribunals & Adjudication Service

Clerk to the Bar Tribunals & Adjudication Service

Interests

Ed was a Trustee of the Kalisher Trust from 2019 – 2022.

Ed greatly enjoys assisting with moots and other educational events at Gray’s Inn.

In his spare time, Ed enjoys all sports. He represented Oxfordshire County Cricket at all age groups up to men’s second eleven. He is a playing member of the MCC. He represented the Bar of England and Wales Cricket Club at the Lawyer’s World Cup in New Zealand in 2019/20 and Sri Lanka in 2017.

Ed is a very keen traveller.

GDPR Policy
Menu

Furnival Chambers